| Welcome to the Kia Owners Club Forums! If you're new here, please introduce yourself in the Newbies Kia Forum, we have forums for each Kia Model so please make sure you post in the correct forum. We now have Kia Owners Stickers and Keyrings to buy! |
Stereo unit - poor sound |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
timtheenchanteruk
Senior Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 Location: Leeds, UK Status: Offline Points: 182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Dec 2011 at 8:06pm |
Me thinks you are confused here. CDs are 44.1Khz, this is the SAMPLING rate, ie 44100 samples per second, this is fairly standard, there is also 32Khz, as used by nicam stereo TV, 48KHz used by higher end and prosumer audio stuff, and 96Khz, used in most pro end audio systems, and now 192Khz used in blueray. the most common mistakes is using too low a BIT rate on your MP3, I would reccomend 256 as a good(ish) balance between quality and file size, 320 is the best, but also gives the largest file size, 192 is the minimum I would use, and even then only at a push, the bottom end is cut off more, and the top end becomes less crisp. as to loosing volume, this is usually down the the converter rather than the actual conversion, alot of the converters result in a audio peak level of -4, I use exact audio copy (google for it) if just ripping a CD, this keeps the level as the original, although you may perceive a slight loss in volume due to the compression down to MP3. Good enough for in the car. Ive not found an all in one solution yet, (ie rip, covert, normalise) but ideally the final MP3 needs to be "normalised" ie get the peak audio to 0db. It does amuse me that for years people have been striving for better and better quality of sound, think cassette to CD etc, and now going backwards to highly compressed carp in MP3s AACs etc. for those with cars with USB sockets, most of these will work an external hard drive, it just needs to be formatted in the FAT32 format, rather than the NTFS or other options vista/7 give you.
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Dano
Moderator Group
Kia Forum Moderator Joined: 26 Nov 2010 Location: Uk Status: Offline Points: 709 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 at 4:16am |
|
I'm certainly not confused :/ I've build loads of audio car for modified live events and modified nations for Spl events and I also make my own songs and dubstep remixes for customers and works for me . ( I know the offical name for the rate is kHz but most people in the car audio world call it hz to make it easier )
Edited by Dano - 01 Jan 2012 at 4:19am |
|
![]() |
|
timtheenchanteruk
Senior Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 Location: Leeds, UK Status: Offline Points: 182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 at 9:07am |
|
its still the bit rate that makes more difference to the sound than the sample rate, I've engineered sound for plenty of live events both band and theatre using live and recorded sound. and done a bit of studio engineering too.
a 44.1 mp3 at 92Kb/s will still sound carp next to a 44.1 256KB/s mp3 (in fact a 32Khz @256 would sound better)
|
|
![]() |
|
captainoats
Groupie
Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Location: Northampton Status: Offline Points: 50 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Jan 2012 at 9:39am |
|
Most of my mp3's are either 256 or 320 anyway. As long as the sound is clear and crisp for me I am happy. Would love a vinyl deck in the car for thumping bass and better mid range. I read somewhere that CD looses alot of mid range. Alot of people swear vinyl is very clear and gives a warm feeling.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |




Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)

Dano wrote:
